PLANNING COMMISSION

                                                             February 18, 2004

 

THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE GREENE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION WAS HELD ON WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 18, 2004, AT 7:30 pm IN THE COUNTY MEETING ROOM.

 

Those present were: Gary Lowe, Chairman

                                                Helen Phillips, Vice-Chairperson

                                                Jim Davis, Member

                                                Michael Skeens, Member                                                               

                                                Brent Wilson, Member

                                                Mickey Cox, Ex-officio Member

Susan Riddle, County Engineer

Marsha Alley, Secretary

 

The chairman called the meeting to order stating that the first order of business would be the election of officers and appointments.

 

Ms. Phillips nominated Gary Lowe for Chairman.  Mr. Skeens seconded the nomination.  The vote was taken by ballot.  Gary Lowe was voted in as Chairman.

 

Mr. Skeens nominated Helen Phillips for Vice-chairman.  Mr. Wilson seconded the nomination.  The vote was taken by ballot.  Helen Phillips was voted in as Vice-chairman.

 

Mr. Skeens was reappointed to serve on the Stanardsville Planning Commission.

 

Mr. Lowe was reappointed to serve on the Economic Development Authority.

 

Mr. Lowe noted that the first public hearing scheduled for the evening had been deferred at the request of the applicant.  He added that a sign-up sheet was available for those who wished to address the Commission in regard to the public hearing.

 

PUBLIC HEARING:              Janet Call—Special Use Permit Request #04-720

 

Mr. Lowe read the request:  Janet Call requests a special use permit to operate a Bed and Breakfast on 28.737 acres, which is zoned A-1, and located at 455 Touchstone Lane and identified on County Tax Maps as 47-(A)-70. (SUP#04-720)

 

Ms. Riddle gave a staff report in conjunction with a digital presentation including maps, site sketches, and photographs.  She stated that a site development plan would be required for this project.  She added that the project would include connecting the existing house to a newly constructed 5 bedroom Bed & Breakfast by a breezeway. 

 

Ms. Riddle stated that a special use permit is required for the operation of a bed & breakfast.  She noted that the property has 250 ft. of road frontage along a private road (Touchstone Lane) and that it would be served by private well and private septic.  She added that the Comprehensive Plan supports the application.  She described the property as secluded with scenic views which would allow the project to fit well in the area.  She noted that the size of the parcel would minimize the impacts on neighboring properties. 

 

Ms. Riddle stated that the road serving the property does need some improvements and should be better maintained.  She noted that VDOT has concerns that must be addressed and met during the site development plan review process.

 

Ms. Riddle advised the Commission that public comments had been received and were included in the packet.  She stated that staff recommended approval of the request with the conditions listed in the staff report.

 

Ed Yensho addressed the Commission on behalf of the Calls.  He stated that the Calls purchased the property about 2 years ago with the intent to retire there.  He stated that the existing home would be remodeled and would have 1 bedroom.  He added that it would be connected by a breezeway to a new structure which would contain the 5 bedroom Bed & Breakfast as well as the Calls’ residence.  He noted that the new structure will be built in an art and crafts style.  He stated that it would be an upscale project.

 

Mr. Yensho stated that the Calls had met with some of the neighbors in order to address their concerns, such as parking, lighting, etc.  He noted that Mrs. Call is a good administrator and that he expected that project to be a success.  He stated that the bed and breakfast would only operate on weekends and that no children would be allowed.  He added that day events are speculation at this point but noted that weddings are not intended unless for personal family events.  He anticipates the project to welcome tourists and expects it to be a top-flight operation.

 

Mark Meyer addressed the Commission.  He stated that he and his wife are neighbors in the viewshed of the proposed project.  He noted that he supports the project, adding that it is a good idea, but that he also has concerns about the viewshed.  He listed his concerns as:

  • Parking, which has been addressed with the applicant and may be moved as a result.
  • Large events such as weddings, festivals, etc.
  • Noise
  • Future of the property—if sold, could the new owner create a different use?

He added that he would like to see the rural nature of the county maintained and asked that the Commission consider these issues.

 

Jill Meyer addressed the Commission.  She asked what would prohibit future owners of the property to expand this business and how would any restrictions addressed in terms of future growth.

 

Mr. Lowe advised her that her questions would be discussed during the Commission comment portion of the meeting.

 

Jodie Webber addressed the Commission.  She stated that she is an adjoining property owner fronting on Route 603/Bingham Mountain Road near Autumn Hill Vineyard.  She listed her concerns as:

  • Conscious efforts need to be made in the development of the property, noting that she supports the idea of tourism in Greene without the impacts.
  • The building site and lighting, etc. will remind her of a business being located nearby.

She added that she hopes that having a bed and breakfast next door will not change the residential character and setting of the area.

 

There being no further public comment, the public hearing was closed.

 

Mr. Wilson asked for clarification on the parking issue.

 

Mr. Yensho stated that the parking shown in the site sketch is preferred by the applicant but that the neighbors prefer the parking to be located in the front area of the property near the cul-de-sac.  He added that the applicant discussed this issue with the neighbors and is willing to relocate the parking area.

 

Mr. Wilson asked if the lighting would be motion activated.

 

Mr. Yensho stated that the lighting will be motion activated.

 

Mr. Skeens asked if the road or easement to the property could be used for the proposed use.

 

Ms. Riddle explained that the easement is not restrictive for the bed and breakfast use.

 

Ms. Phillips asked about the Health Department concerns.

 

Mr. Yensho explained that a new septic field and a new well would be installed for the new structure.

 

Mr. Davis asked how this project would be rated.

 

Mr. Yensho stated that it would be rated as a 5 bedroom, noting that the Calls’ residence, which will have 1 bedroom, would also be located in the new building.

 

Ms. Phillips asked if a site development plan had been submitted.

 

Mr. Yensho stated that a formal site development plan has not been submitted at this time so that any conditions or changes could be made prior to submission.

 

Mr. Lowe reminded the Commission that a formal site development plan is not required at this time.

 

Mr. Lowe asked if the VDOT requirements could be met.

 

Mr. Yensho stated that he just found out about the VDOT requirements today and that he will have to meet with VDOT on the site. 

 

There was discussion regarding the VDOT comments and how they can be met.

 

Mr. Lowe stated that he shared the concerns with the neighboring property owners and asked what outside activities would be considered.

 

Mr. Yensho stated that the applicant intends to hold club meetings, retreats, picnicking, seminars and events of that nature.

 

Mr. Lowe asked what the maximum attendance would be for these types of events.

 

Mr. Yensho stated that he would expect 50 people or less.

 

Mr. Lowe asked if these events would be held in the daytime only.

 

Mr. Yensho stated that these events would be held in the daytime only.

 

Mr. Lowe stated that if the property is sold, the special use permit would follow the property, and the new owner would be held to the same conditions.  He added that if the new owner wanted to change any aspects of the special use permit, he would have to go through the public hearing process.

 

Mr. Lowe stated that he agreed that whenever possible, it is necessary to preserve the rural atmosphere of the area.

 

Mr. Skeens asked what type of buffer would be needed at the Roach River.

 

Mr. Yensho stated that he was not familiar with that condition, adding that there is a 100 ft. flood plain restriction at the river.

 

Mr. Wilson made a motion to recommend approval of SUP#04-720 with the following conditions:

A)                As part of the site plan review process, site issues that include the Health Department’s septic/drainfield and bed and breakfast regulations are met as stated in the Health Department comments,

 

B)                The entrance from Chapman Road is improved to a condition agreeable with VDOT.

 

C)                Touchstone Lane is improved with gravel to cover the width of the existing road.

 

D)                Outdoor lighting is limited and includes the use of timer and/or motion-detection fixtures.

 

E)                As part of the site plan review, parking shall be located on the west side of the existing residence.

 

F)                 The bed and breakfast shall be limited to a maximum of six (6) bedrooms.

 

G)                The Roach River along with a fifty (50') buffer located on the northern boundary of the property shall be maintained in its current state, used only for natural purposes.

 

H)                Outdoor activities are restricted to 50 people or less.

 

There was discussion on the conditions.

 

Ms. Phillips seconded the motion.

 

The vote was taken.

 

AYE                                                                            NAY

Mr. Wilson

Mr. Skeens

Mr. Davis

Ms. Phillips

Mr. Lowe

 

The motion to recommend approval was carried unanimously.

 

OLD/NEW BUSINESS 

Preliminary Plat Review—South Ridge Subdivision

 

Ms. Riddle gave a staff report which included a digital presentation of maps, sketches, plats, and photos.  She described the property as 48.8 acres, zoned Residential, R-1, identified on County Tax Maps as 65-(A)-39.  She stated that the proposal is for 31 lots with open space. 

 

Ms. Riddle stated that there are currently 2 residences on the property which is wooded with some pasture land.  She noted that the property would be served by public water and private septic.  She stated that there would be one internal road serving the area, adding that the lots fronting on Route 606/Spring Hill Road must enter from the internal road; no entrances would be allowed on to Spring Hill Road.  She added that the request is a by-right division of the property.  She described the entrance to the subdivision as being located directly across from the entrance to Cross Creek Subdivision. 

 

Ms. Riddle explained that the existing house will be located on proposed lot 7 and that the manufactured home will be removed.  She stated that the property is located within the desired growth area and existing rural residential area as shown on the Future Land Use Map of the Comprehensive Plan.  She added that the Comprehensive Plan supports the application. 

 

Ms. Riddle pointed out that lots 10-14 will be required to demonstrate that they meet the frontage requirements for parcels on a cul-de-sac that is 70 ft.  She also stated that there restrictive covenants will be imposed which will require a property owner’s association, an architectural review board, minimum house sizes, etc.  She stated that staff recommends preliminary approval of the submitted plat.

 

Ted Kostich addressed the Commission.  He stated that all requirements have been met and asked for approval of the plat.  He added that he was available to answer any questions.

 

Mr. Lowe stated that the request is a by-right division and that it appeared to have met and exceeded the minimum requirements.  He added that everything seemed in order.

 

Mr. Wilson asked what the estimated house size and price range would be.

 

Mr. Kostich stated that the houses would be 2,200-2,600 square feet is size and be in a price range of $300,000-$350,000.  He added that the houses would be ranch-style and 2-story homes.

 

Mr. Davis asked if the existing house met those requirements.

 

Mr. Kostich stated that the existing house would be demolished, noting that they had recently discovered extensive termite damage and other issues.  He added that the Planning Department was not aware of this change until tonight.

 

Mr. Lowe asked for clarification on lots 10-14. 

 

Mr. Kostich stated that the calculations needed to be verified for the frontage for those lots on the cul-de-sac.

 

Mr. Skeens made a motion to approve SDV#03-262 with the following conditions:

A)                Parcels 10-14 be demonstrated to meet the minimum frontage requirement of           seventy (70) feet, and

B)                The existing house will be removed.

 

Mr. Wilson seconded the motion.

 

The vote was taken.

 

AYE                                                                            NAY

Mr. Davis

Ms. Phillips

Mr. Wilson

Mr. Skeens

Mr. Lowe

 

The motion to approve carried by unanimous vote.

 

APPROVAL OF MINUTES

 

The minutes of the December 17, 2003 meeting were unanimously approved as submitted.

 

OTHER PLANNING MATTERS

 

Mr. Lowe stated that Greg Collier’s term expired and the seat has been filled by Jim Davis. He introduced Mr. Davis and asked him to greet the Commission.

 

Mr. Davis stated that he is a long-time Greene County resident.  He stated that he has been involved with community service in other areas and was looking forward to working on the Planning Commission.

 

Mr. Lowe advised him to put on his seatbelt and enjoy the ride!

 

Mr. Lowe reminded the Commission that Planning Seminars are being offered, and he encouraged everyone to attend them if possible. 

 

ADJOURNMENT

 

There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned.

 

Respectfully submitted,

 

Marsha Alley

Secretary